Android and the Form Post Download problem…

Only 338 points *and* no POST download???
Only 338 points *and* no POST download???

Another day, another workaround… This time, it was for this rather annoying issue that’s been open for over four years (maybe because it’s in as an RFE and not an actual bug, who knows?). It basically describes an unexpected behaviour in the stock Android browser, whereby it cannot handle form POST requests that result in a file download.

This was picked up by one of the testers on (thanks Natalie!) where we’re using form post to facilitate saving image data from an HTML 5 canvas to the user’s computer. This is something that some browsers can handle without server involvement, but support varies and the various browsers implement filename selection in different ways, so we went with the solution of posting the Base64-encoded image data back to the server, which then initiates a download with disposition: attachment, allowing us to give the file whatever name we like.

This works fine on every browser we’re targeting, except the stock Android browser in everything from Gingerbread to Jelly Bean. Clicking the “Download” button on that browser resulted in “Download unsuccessful” 100% of the time.

This took some tracking down, and after sanity checking the appropriate code to make sure we were returning the right content-type and so forth, I turned to the logs to see if I could see anything out of the ordinary. Sure enough, enlightenment ensued:

Started POST "/download" for at 2013-04-28 20:17:28 +0100
<<Base64 parameters elided>>
Processing by AppController#download as HTML
Rendered text template (0.0ms)
Sent data (1.5ms)
Completed 200 OK in 3ms (Views: 1.3ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms) 

Started GET "/download" for at 2013-04-28 20:17:29 +0100
Processing by AppController#download as HTML
Completed 500 Internal Server Error in 2ms (Views: 1.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms)

Immediately after sending the POST, Android follows up with a GET to the same endpoint. After some thinking (read: Googling) I decided that this must be the download manager trying to grab the file – the browser simply ignores the first (successful) response, and instead launches the download manager to grab the file via a GET. The problem is, somewhere along the way, the form post data is discarded.

In our particular case even if the post data wasn’t discarded, GET would never work because the Base64-encoded image data is simply too big for a GET request – Our Heroku dyno would simply refuse to touch it. Even if the browser insists on using a download manager in this way, my expected behaviour would be for it to pass along the entire request to it. However, on Android that might mean stuffing a large amount of Base64 into an intent, which could cause other problems.

It’s at this point that I found the aforementioned “RFE” 1780 and realised that this is what I was up against. Given the previous paragraph I can allow that this isn’t as simple a fix as it might first appear, but still – four years and no love?

In the end, I decided the only way forward was simply to work-around the problem by doing the image download a different way on the stock Android browser. Fortunately, I had already implemented server-side image generation for use with the Facebook integration, so all I needed to do was make the download button behave differently in Android stock. Here’s the Javascript that does that:

/* Download image from canvas */
function downloadImage(canvas) {
  var data = canvas.toDataURL("image/png");

  // Stock android browser can't download from post.
  // See:
  var ua = navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();
  var isStockAndroid = ua.indexOf("android") > -1 && ua.indexOf("chrome") == -1 && ua.indexOf("dolphin") == -1;

  if(isStockAndroid || data.substr(0,6) == "data:,") {
    // redirect to server-side download
    window.location = getGeneratedPictureURL() + "?d=1&";
  } else {
    post_to_url("/download", { data: data });

(Note: This also works around an issue with pre-Gingerbread, where canvas.toDataURL is not actually implemented).

What this actually does is check if the user-agent reports Android, but also that it doesn’t specify any of the browsers that are known to work. I had to go this way since the stock browser’s user agent doesn’t easily allow us to do single-step sniffing. If the stock browser is detected, the form post is skipped, and server-side generation is used instead (getGeneratedPictureURL() returns the server-side URL for the currently-displayed image, and we just add some parameters to force disposition: attachment and set the filename).

This works, but in my opinion it’s not ideal. The user’s browser has already done the work of generating this image, but that load is then pushed back onto the server when the Download button is clicked. This is not a trivial thing – the image generation (using ImageMagick behind the scenes) is a relatively slow operation. Of course we cache the generated images, but with 20M+ possible combinations we don’t keep them cached forever.

All we can hope at this point is that 1780 gets some attention at some point soon. If you’re so inclined, you might even want to head over there and star it to let the AOSP guys know it’s still alive…


Published by roscopeco

IT guy, code junkie, mobile app developer, occasional blender artist and open-source activist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Blog about the TTL based CPU design we're making

Don Charisma

because anything is possible with Charisma

Tech Filled Fantasy

One stop shop for all your tech-filled pleasures!

%d bloggers like this: